Posting 9
(with apologies to J. Duzarf)
To the readers:
What marvelous simplicity, yet depth of thought we encounter
as we begin a look at Article One of the United States Constitution.
It begins with the creation of the legislative branch of
government, one of the three branches of government, the other two being the
judicial and the executive. We note again the simplicity of the statement that
“All Legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the
United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.” This
is known as a bi-cameral body, meaning “two chambers:” the chambers referring
to, in this case, the Senate and the House of Representatives.
The question that arises periodically throughout history
concerns the benefit of having two “houses” or “chambers.” Yet again, we see
the wisdom of having these two houses: a House of Representatives, based on the
population of the states and—it would seem—be a true representation of the
people; and the Senate, with each state granted two Senators each and thus,
representing the states.
It should be noted that the legislative powers are vested in
the Congress. Indeed, throughout the history of this great land, much
frustration and debate has arisen over laws that are seemingly handed down through the issuance of a Presidential
Executive Order (legislation by the Executive Branch) or created by a ruling of
the Supreme Court (legislation by the Judicial Branch). Even within recent
history of this essay, a judicially created federal “right” was overturned,
resulting in national anger, unrest, and division from those who failed to
realize that the “right” in question was never passed through the Legislative
Branch of Government.
Must it always be the case that legislation must always rest
within the Congress? Could there not be cases in which it is prudent for the
President or the Supreme Court to act in a legislative fashion? To that, I must
defer debate. It is beyond the scope of these essays to explore whether there
are exceptions to the practice of legislation within the Legislative Branch alone.
Greater legal minds than that of this writer are weighing in on this and will,
no doubt, continue to weigh in. Although I must say that I doubt a conclusion
will be reached that will satisfy the points-of-view of every conceivable
rabble whose opinion is roused.
It would seem to this writer that the safest course of
action is to return to the original statement which prescribes the legislative
powers be vested in the bi-cameral Congress of the United States of America.
by Aplo